Damn- I never thought I'd see the day Governor Goodhair did anything I agreed with. Is the ground getting cold under your feet? I'm in a high-rise and so I can't really tell...
You actually agree with this ass hat!!!!!!!!!!!! Vaccinating an 11 to 12 year old girl against an STD! Would you like to have the conversation with a little girl of 11 or 12 about sex std's and the like??
I have stated over and over I am glad there is a vaccine. I will gladly give this to my child. WHEN I FEEL MY CHILD IS ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My choice to talk to my child about sex and saftey has been taken away. I have to do this because some FUCKING MALE WITH A PENIS has decreed that MY VAGINA AND MY CERVIX are his to DICTATE health to not only to me ( I am too old for this) but MY CHILD!
Yes this is a great thing. But you tell an 11 year old girl that they have to get 3 shots that HURT, sting, Itch, and is sensitive for a bit; they are nto going to want it. They are going to ask why. "Why do I have to get this shot." Well to protect you from getting sick "What kind of sick" Well cancer "what kind of cancer" Cervical Cancer "what is a Cervix" (Explainitation given) "Well how do I get that virus that makes me ill" Well honey sex "Why don't the boys have to have the shot" Because the CDC has nto finished it and does not see a benifit to them yet.
NO SORRY I DON"T FEEL THAT ALL 11 YEAR OLD GIRLS NEED TO GO THROUGHT THIS.
It is my job to teach my child helath and saftey, considering schools are nto really teaching anything these days other that this is what your period/wet dream is and don't have sex abstinance is the way to be safe.
Do I think that this vaccination is going to cause girls to run out and have sex? NO.
Is it MY job to educate my child and keep them healthy? YES!
ON the CDC web site the vaccination is ONLY for the Sexually Transmitted Versions of HPV. So we are giving girls as young as 9 a vaccine for an STD? WTF?
Not to mention Govenor Perry is SO FUCKING FAR IN BED WITH MERIK IT IS NOT FUNNY. Read the article closely. He made an EXECUTIVE ORDER. He by passed legislature. he got Money for his campaign from Merik Read the article! He has ties to Merik and Women in Government. BTW the vaccine is ONLY PRODUCED BY MERIK.
Here read this article. http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/conditions/02/02/cancer.vaccine.ap/index.html This is hoe the insurance and Doctors feel
Here is the article cross posted http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/conditions/02/02/tx.cervical.cancer.ap/index.html Now here are exerpts form that article you need to pay close attention to: "Perry also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign"
and
"Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry's former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government."
Our govenor FUCKED us Women ROYALLY and handeled this verry POORLY. He could have handeled this better.
Did I vote No. My registration card prevented me from voting near were I live (unbeknownst to me it expired shortly before election day). To be honest that does nto matter. i would have voted for Kikny anyway!
(also, please DO NOT DISCUSS THIS WITH ME IN PERSON. I feel verry passionately about my daughter's health, my health and MEN DICKtating to WOMEN how they need to carefor them selves.
Hint: we have been taking care of our selves LONG before men decided we needed help.
I was pointing out that it was strange that he came up with a thought I somewhat agree with. And I've read the articles in question. And I still think he's a sleazeball. And I happen to have my own thoughts on this, ones that don't come solely from have the desire to dicktate- apparently I've become some kind of demon to be whipped on and yelled at now? Kindly cool the flame, ok?
no, an yes I appoligize to Kitty for the article. What Perry did is wrong. I have had several people ask me since he authorized the use for young girls am I going to vaccinate my daughter. What people are not seeing is that he did this a under table as possible so that no one could challenge him. He did not authorize this for young girls the CDC did that back in June 2006. What Perry is doing is FORCING me to do something I do not feel is right for my child.The people who have agreed with him do not have have childres, much less daughters, are not feemale, if they are female they are tool old for the vaccination currently, and if the do have daughters they are not worried because they have years before they have to get vaccinated.
I have had people tell me they don't see a reason that my daughter should not be vaccinated t 11 or 12. Well that is not their decision it is mine. People are seeing him do something as good when in reality he is dictating womens helath and he has A) no right, B) no anatomy to be making such mandatory requirements.
As I have said, several people see this as a wonderful thing he has done. he handeled it poorly and dealt a blow to familes and set a precedent for women's health.
I am sorry if I flammed you. My response was a bit fast, but I do want people to see the potential down side as well and what he took away.
Children are entering sex education before that age anyway.
All that truly matters is that it saves lives. Granted they went about it in the wrong way, but none the less, life is important. I'm not supporting their actions or their methods, but the vaccine is good, and giving it to kids after sex education is also good (with parent's consent of course).
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
trickykitty) wrote2007-02-03 11:30 am
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
Vaccinating an 11 to 12 year old girl against an STD!
Would you like to have the conversation with a little girl of 11 or 12 about sex std's and the like??
I have stated over and over I am glad there is a vaccine. I will gladly give this to my child. WHEN I FEEL MY CHILD IS ABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My choice to talk to my child about sex and saftey has been taken away. I have to do this because some FUCKING MALE WITH A PENIS has decreed that MY VAGINA AND MY CERVIX are his to DICTATE health to not only to me ( I am too old for this) but MY CHILD!
Yes this is a great thing. But you tell an 11 year old girl that they have to get 3 shots that HURT, sting, Itch, and is sensitive for a bit; they are nto going to want it. They are going to ask why. "Why do I have to get this shot." Well to protect you from getting sick "What kind of sick" Well cancer "what kind of cancer" Cervical Cancer "what is a Cervix" (Explainitation given) "Well how do I get that virus that makes me ill" Well honey sex "Why don't the boys have to have the shot" Because the CDC has nto finished it and does not see a benifit to them yet.
NO SORRY I DON"T FEEL THAT ALL 11 YEAR OLD GIRLS NEED TO GO THROUGHT THIS.
It is my job to teach my child helath and saftey, considering schools are nto really teaching anything these days other that this is what your period/wet dream is and don't have sex abstinance is the way to be safe.
Do I think that this vaccination is going to cause girls to run out and have sex? NO.
Is it MY job to educate my child and keep them healthy? YES!
ON the CDC web site the vaccination is ONLY for the Sexually Transmitted Versions of HPV. So we are giving girls as young as 9 a vaccine for an STD? WTF?
Not to mention
Govenor Perry is SO FUCKING FAR IN BED WITH MERIK IT IS NOT FUNNY. Read the article closely. He made an EXECUTIVE ORDER. He by passed legislature. he got Money for his campaign from Merik Read the article! He has ties to Merik and Women in Government.
BTW the vaccine is ONLY PRODUCED BY MERIK.
Here read this article.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/conditions/02/02/cancer.vaccine.ap/index.html
This is hoe the insurance and Doctors feel
Here is the article cross posted
http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/conditions/02/02/tx.cervical.cancer.ap/index.html
Now here are exerpts form that article you need to pay close attention to:
"Perry also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign"
and
"Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry's former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government."
Our govenor FUCKED us Women ROYALLY and handeled this verry POORLY. He could have handeled this better.
Did I vote No. My registration card prevented me from voting near were I live (unbeknownst to me it expired shortly before election day). To be honest that does nto matter. i would have voted for Kikny anyway!
(also, please DO NOT DISCUSS THIS WITH ME IN PERSON. I feel verry passionately about my daughter's health, my health and MEN DICKtating to WOMEN how they need to carefor them selves.
Hint: we have been taking care of our selves LONG before men decided we needed help.
no subject
no subject
I have had people tell me they don't see a reason that my daughter should not be vaccinated t 11 or 12. Well that is not their decision it is mine. People are seeing him do something as good when in reality he is dictating womens helath and he has A) no right, B) no anatomy to be making such mandatory requirements.
As I have said, several people see this as a wonderful thing he has done. he handeled it poorly and dealt a blow to familes and set a precedent for women's health.
I am sorry if I flammed you.
My response was a bit fast, but I do want people to see the potential down side as well and what he took away.
Again sorry
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-02-04 02:20 am (UTC)(link)Children are entering sex education before that age anyway.
All that truly matters is that it saves lives. Granted they went about it in the wrong way, but none the less, life is important. I'm not supporting their actions or their methods, but the vaccine is good, and giving it to kids after sex education is also good (with parent's consent of course).
no subject
From what I understand sex education here in Texas is not what is could/should/or used to be.